Peer review

Source: The image was taken from Google images.

Preliminary assessment

Articles and documents submitted to Revista Ciência Dinâmica will initially be evaluated by the Editorial Committee, which will verify whether they meet the following editorial criteria:

1) not present plagiarism, as verified;

2) strictly comply with the formatting and bibliographic citation standards established by the journal;

3) be within the scope of the magazine.

Once approved at this stage, the manuscripts will be sent to be assessed by referees. Contributions will be analyzed by at least two internal or external evaluators (peer review) in a double-blind review system, in which the names of authors and reviewers are kept confidential.

Peer review

Double-blind peer review is carried out entirely through the Open Journal System (OJS), which guarantees the confidentiality of all parties involved (authors and reviewers).

The journal "Revista Ciência Dinâmica" has its own form composed of several questions that reviewers must answer carefully. This form includes a final text box for comments considered relevant to be adapted by the authors.

The evaluators of Revista Ciência Dinâmica are internal and external to the journal team.

The editorial board is responsible for selecting reviewers who are independent of the authors, that is, who do not have a direct relationship (research partnerships).

The steps for evaluating the manuscript are as follows:

a) Assessment of plagiarism and compliance with the required formatting and bibliographic citation rules;

b) assessment of the article's proximity to the journal's editorial policy;

c) Double-blind evaluation of the nature and content of the article by two internal or external reviewers (double-blind peer review);

d) The referees are independent;